Hi Cullen, Thanks for your review.
We will include the range 0x20-0x7E in the spec and this was also what Benjamin Kaduk had suggested. We will incorporate this in the next version of the document. Thanks, Ketan On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:10 AM Cullen Jennings via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Cullen Jennings > Review result: Ready > > This draft does not raise any issues specific to the ART area. > > The use of non UTF symbolic names is appropriate for this use case so I do > not > see any issues with strings. I view printable ascii as fairly well defined > but > if you want to be clearer, you could say 0x20 to 0x7E. > > As an outside reader not involved with the spring WG, this draft was > relatively > easy to understand. I do not see any problems with publication. > > > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
