Dear Authors et al.
thank you for this document. I am supporting and following the work on the
Alternate Marking method in various IETF WGs. What do you see as the
benefits of defining a new SRH TLV for the Alternate Marking method
compared to solutions defined for IPv6 in draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark/>?

Regards,
Greg
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to