Joel, One thing that could have been more clear (of many such things, no doubt)...
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:39 PM Erik Kline <ek.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > [replying on this thread as is has more folks cc'd] > --- > > Next steps for consideration: > > [A] A separate 6MAN document to clarify and categorize SRv6 SIDs is > needed. We are happy to work to find authors for this document. > ... we have taken this action item to find authors for the 6MAN SRv6 SIDs document. We'll start reaching out to folks shortly.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
