Speaking as a WG chair from another WG: If you followed the SPRING debate preceding the formation of the DT, it was obvious that allowing open membership to the DT would not have been feasible given the number of people participating and the combative tone of the discussion. I think the chairs did an excellent job of selecting and chartering the design team.
Thanks, Acee From: spring <[email protected]> on behalf of James Guichard <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 at 9:34 AM To: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>, Wim Henderickx <[email protected]> Cc: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>, SPRING WG <[email protected]>, "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 SID List compression Hi Robert, In short the answer to your question is no. The chairs tried to create an inclusive DT that had representation from all sides of the compression debate. In addition the chairs deliberately stepped back and did not interfere in the DT work. Jim, Joel & Bruno From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 7:49 PM To: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <[email protected]> Cc: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>; SPRING WG <[email protected]>; Darren Dukes (ddukes) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 SID List compression On the composition of the DT, the selection was done by the WG, so are we questioning if this was done appropriately. People have various backgrounds and I found the mix pretty good. Again if after 1 year this is being discussed I find this very odd. Could have been done a while ago if there were concerns. Was there anyone denied by the SPRING chairs to join this DT ? If yes - let's hear from the chairs why. If not - the point is moot. Thx, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
