Thanks, Jim,
I've been following the enhanced VPN work in TEAS and I see it as a key piece of the network slicing work. It's time that we had some protocol solutions that serve the VPN framework, and this is a suitable starting point. I like that it is not specifying additional protocol widgets but has looked at what we already have and is pointing up ways to use those tools to deliver new function. I see Robert's point about the resource reservation aspects of traffic engineering applied to an SR network, but this is not an insurmountable problem. The question might be asked, "Why would you want to do that?" but that is a question that (as Yakov would have said) the market can decide. It seems that there are a couple of vendors and a couple of operators who have an interest. So I think we should adopt this draft and see whether we can turn it into something that has great utility. Cheers, Adrian From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: 27 January 2021 11:47 To: spring@ietf.org Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn Dear WG: This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ ending February 10th 2021. After review of the document please indicate support (or not) for WG adoption to the mailing list and if you are willing to work on the document, please state this explicitly. This gives the chairs an indication of the energy level of people in the working group willing to work on this document. Please also provide comments/reasons for your support (or lack thereof) as this is a stronger way to indicate your (non) support as this is not a vote. Thanks! Jim, Bruno & Joel
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
