I support WG adoption. Thanks
Gyan On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:46 AM Zafar Ali (zali) <zali= 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Support! > > > > Thanks > > > > Regards … Zafar > > > > *From: *spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of James Guichard < > james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> > *Date: *Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 8:52 AM > *To: *"spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> > *Cc: *"ippm-cha...@ietf.org" <ippm-cha...@ietf.org>, " > spring-cha...@ietf.org" <spring-cha...@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[spring] WG Adoption Call for > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03 > > > > Dear WG: > > > > This message starts a 3 week WG adoption call for > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03, ending > November 12th 2020. Please note that this document has several changes > from v-02 that were requested by the SPRING and IPPM chairs. For this > reason, the chairs have extended the adoption call for an additional week > to allow the WG enough time to review these changes before deciding on WG > adoption. > > > > Some background: > > > > Several review comments were received previously for document > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02. The SPRING > and IPPM chairs considered those comments, and upon review of this version > of the document, determined the following: > > > > - The SPRING document should describe only the procedures relevant to > SPRING with pointers to non-SPRING document/s that define any extensions. > Several extensions including* Control Code Field Extension for STAMP > Messages*, *Loss Measurement Query Message Extensions*, *Loss > Measurement Response Message Extensions*, *Node Address TLV Extensions*, > and *Return Path TLV Extensions* were included in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 and > should be removed from the SPRING document. > - The STAMP extensions included in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 should > be described in a new document published in the IPPM WG. > > > > These conclusions were discussed with the authors of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-02 the result > of which is the publication of the following two documents: > > > > - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03. The > subject of this WG adoption call. > - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm-00. This > document will be progressed (if determined by the WG) within the IPPM WG. > > > > After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for > WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for > that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent. > > > > Finally, the chairs would like to thank the authors for their efforts in > this matter. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jim, Bruno, & Joel > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
