> > (5) This point is for the IESG to discuss. > > ยง4.16.1.2: > > The End, End.X and End.T behaviors with PSP do not contravene > Section 4 of [RFC8200] because the destination address of the > incoming packet is the address of the node executing the behavior. > > The spring WG's interpretation of rfc8200 was a central point in the appeal > presented against the WG consensus on this document. The text above, I > believe, reflects that consensus. > > However, given that the document relies on the spring WG's interpretation > of > rfc8200, I think it would be better if the text is explicit. > > Suggestion: to add at the end of the paragraph> > > This conclusion represents the consensus interpretation of the spring > WG. >
This seems like an important -- and entirely reasonable -- thing to note.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
