I support the adoption of this draft. The proposal provides a useful extension of SR regarding network resources.
I have the following suggestions for the authors to consider: * The draft is very slicing/virtual network focused, however the proposal can be used in generic cases, e.g. with SR-TE. I’d suggest adding some text or use cases, or as a special case of a virtual network. * About scalability especially in SR-MPLS, the label range is limited. It’s mentioned in section 2.1, but could use some elaborations. Thanks, Yingzhen From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 4:17 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" <spring-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn Resent-From: <yingzhen...@huawei.com> Dear WG: This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7C62940ff55d094466bef508d828b0b08d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637304086634789052&sdata=Q3G9%2F7b4cyRLRpre%2B%2F%2BVLMJYY88ut0GbceKauulQXG0%3D&reserved=0> ending Wednesday 29th July 2020. Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the WG. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof). Silence will not be considered consent. Thanks! Jim, Joel & Bruno
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
