Dear All,
We have posted a new draft describing extensions to MPLS LSP ping to support
verification between the control plane and the data plane state for MPLS-based
SFC (including SR-MPLS service programming and MPLS-based NSH).
Comments, suggestions and questions are more than welcome.
Thanks,
Yao
原始邮件
发件人：internet-dra...@ietf.org <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
收件人：刘尧00165286;Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>;
日 期 ：2020年07月13日 09:15
主 题 ：New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Revision: 00
Title: MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency Verification
Document date: 2020-07-12
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 9
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Abstract:
This document proposes a method to verify the correlation between
Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view of the
specified Service Function Path and the state of its data. It works
for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
