Robin,
The draft calls out the benefits of SRV6 vs SR/MPLS as the
authors see it. That is fine and is a data point for those considering SRV6
instead of SR/MPLS. So I guess I am confused as to what we are talking about.
If IPV6+ is different and new I would suggest crafting a requirements document
similar to what we did for EVPN. See attached..
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7209/
Thanks,
Jim Uttaro
From: Lizhenbin <lizhen...@huawei.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 8:09 AM
To: UTTARO, JAMES <ju1...@att.com>; Mark Smith <markzzzsm...@gmail.com>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com>
Subject: 答复: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??
Hi Jim,
I respect the comment from the chair. I propose the following draft (because it
is SRv6 work) for your reference on the requirements.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tian-spring-srv6-deployment-consideration-01<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dtian-2Dspring-2Dsrv6-2Ddeployment-2Dconsideration-2D01&d=DwMFbw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=3qhKphE8RnwJQ6u8MrAGeA&m=rZlTYAgCetZk13lEzdKbOH06XI9eujWc1XLPq7DNHOM&s=P4NZY3pETadVCQ71xsC7CXEj6vr9ewpJkd1HWuhPFD8&e=>
L
Later there may be more information when update.
Best Regards,
Robin
________________________________
发件人: UTTARO, JAMES [ju1...@att.com]
发送时间: 2020年7月4日 18:51
收件人: Mark Smith; Lizhenbin
抄送: SPRING WG; Andrew Alston
主题: RE: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??
Where are the requirements.. I mean actual ones..
Thanks,
Jim Uttaro
From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> On
Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2020 6:40 AM
To: Lizhenbin <lizhen...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>; Andrew Alston
<andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com<mailto:andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com>>
Subject: Re: [spring] 答复: IPv6+??
Where are the IPv6+ Internet Drafts?
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020, 18:08 Lizhenbin,
<lizhen...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your paying attention to the website. Please refer to my
clarification.
a. SRv6 is the technology based on IPv6. In the past 20+ years IPv6 has being
deployed. One of the most important drives is the address space. The
development of 5G and cloud proposes the new chances for the development and
deployment of IPv6. Depending on the native IP reacheability and providing rich
attributes based on the IPv6 extension headers, IPv6 can provide flexible
connectivity to satisfy the requirements of 5G and cloud. SRv6 is the typical
representative solutions. This makes this round of IPv6-based innovations and
deployments shows the new characteristics of the times to some extent. Then
IPv6+ concept is proposed. It means the solutions is based on IPv6 and used
for the scenarios of 5G and cloud.
b. IPv6+ has nothing with the New IP. It is apparent that the solutions
proposed in the IPv6+ are based on the IPv6 and all the standardization work is
being done in IETF and has nothing with ITU-T.
I am not sure if it is appropriate to discuss this work in the mailing list of
SPRING WG. More questions and comments can be sent to
ipv6p...@outlook.com<mailto:ipv6p...@outlook.com>.
Best Regards,
Robin
________________________________
发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>] 代表 Andrew
Alston [andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com<mailto:andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com>]
发送时间: 2020年7月4日 1:31
收件人: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
主题: [spring] IPv6+??
Hi All,
I came across this website:
https://www.ipv6plus.net/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ipv6plus.net_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=xY6EacJ5lx2Wdodq3HVdOJnLu47yv-NeOtF_pims9wo&s=MRwEZihBF6LGmyvanssazkk5goh92USabH9rzxSuIcg&e=>
Now, I wish to clarify a few things.
1. This website seems to imply – strong – that Srv6 is not infact IPv6 – but
rather IPv6+ - is this the position of the member of this working group or is
this simply someones bizarre idea?
[Robin
1. This site seems heavily related to the new ip stuff that was presented to
the ITU – does anyone here know if there is any actual relation between this
and that crowd?
Thanks
Andrew
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_spring&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=s7ZzB4JbPv3nYuoSx5Gy8Q&m=xY6EacJ5lx2Wdodq3HVdOJnLu47yv-NeOtF_pims9wo&s=b-d6W4ys7Vc5jHULav7uoajVG1yo_F5vTpaluGS1eIw&e=>
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
