Hi, > Take a step back, assume SRm6 is also adopted, there will be two solutions > for the community to choose; there will be interop issues between the two > solutions. The vendors will have to support both to make different customers > happy, more money will be spent and will be finally payed by the > SPs/customers. > > Do we really want this?
Speaking as an operator: yes Different (parts of) network use different IGPs, different architectures (leaf/spine, clos, core/edge/distribution/access, STP, MLAG, VXLAN, EVPN, VPLS, L2VPN Martini or Kompella) etc etc etc. There is no "one solution fits all", and there are many things besides the feature set that determine what an operator will use. And some technologies will become obsolete, and the networks move on. But as an operator I want to choose. I don't want my vendors or the IETF to choose for me. Cheers, Sander
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
