Thomas,

Many thanks for the review and the feedback. Ack on all. I updated the draft 
according to your and other input from the mailing list.

Looks good!

Two nits:

In the new text in the last paragraph of section 1, remove "to" : "to which 
label protocol it belongs to".

In Figure 1, although the order is unimportant, could RFC 8665 come before RFC 
8667 ?



If the draft is to be accepted by IANA then it needs to be published or 
archived somewhere



This was one of the unclarities I had. If I understand you correctly, this 
draft needs to be adopted by SPRING working group and published as RFC for 
documentation purposes before values can be assigned by IANA. Correct?

Yes, publishing it as an RFC would be the most obvious solution. The language 
in RFC 7012 and RFC 5102 is flexible to allow for non-IETF documents.

P.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to