On 11/3/20 15:32, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Bruno, I can not speak for anyone else. But I have made clear to the
authors (on list) and the AD (off list) that the current revision of the
document does not provide what I consider adequate explanation of the
consequence of the PSP issues.
If progress is such an important concern, then put out NP without PSP,
and issue a separate document with PSP. The NP document (quite
correctly) does not claim to be a complete compilation of all behaviors
or all flavors.
From other people's questions about the PSP processing, it seems that
the text is still not clear about what SID has the PSP flavor (I think I
know how that is supposed to work, but the degree of accidental
misinterpretation suggests the document could be better.)
That's indeed my objection: claiming consensus before folks that raised
issues confirm that they issues they raised have been addressed.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
