Hello, SPRING chairs,

Ditto Re- 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/FzI1bFjYoFza4Ysu9DCOzcWme4I

draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08.txt seems to simply be an attempt to bypass previous 
reviews by shopping a new WG. Instead of responding to technically 
show-stopping comments, this text was removed and now inserted in this new 
draft and new WG.

Best,

Carlos.

2019/11/09 午後0:29、Greg Mirsky 
<gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>のメール:


Dear SPRING WG Chairs,
still awaiting your response to the inquiry below.

Regards,
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08.txt
To: spring <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, 
<spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org>>


Dear All,
with this update, we've added a section on using BFD for Multipoint Networks 
(RFC 8562 and RFC 8563) for proactive defect detection in Point-to-Multipoint 
SR Policies.
Authors believe that the draft is stable and addresses p2p, as well as, p2mp 
use cases of SR-MPLS. We appreciate your consideration of WG adoption poll for 
this specification.

Regards,
Greg

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>>
Date: Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:38 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08.txt
To: Ilya Varlashkin <i...@nobulus.com<mailto:i...@nobulus.com>>, Gregory Mirsky 
<gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>, Ilya Varlashkin 
<i...@nobulus.com<mailto:i...@nobulus.com>>, Jeff Tantsura 
<jefftant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com>>, Mach Chen (Guoyi) 
<mach.c...@huawei.com<mailto:mach.c...@huawei.com>>



A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08.txt
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-mirsky-spring-bfd
Revision:       08
Title:          Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) in Segment Routing 
Networks Using MPLS Dataplane
Document date:  2019-08-02
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          13
URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-spring-bfd/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-mirsky-spring-bfd
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-spring-bfd-08

Abstract:
   Segment Routing (SR) architecture leverages the paradigm of source
   routing.  It can be realized in the Multiprotocol Label Switching
   (MPLS) network without any change to the data plane.  A segment is
   encoded as an MPLS label, and an ordered list of segments is encoded
   as a stack of labels.  Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is
   expected to monitor any existing path between systems.  This document
   defines how to use Label Switched Path Ping to bootstrap a BFD
   session, control path in reverse direction of the SR-MPLS tunnel and
   applicability of BFD Demand mode in the SR-MPLS domain.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org/>.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to