Hi, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Having a virt-viewer flatpak does not mean _not_ having a > > spicy.flatkpak (to me); one is full featured spice client while > > the other a testing tool... > > It looks like a lot of duplication of flatpak effort. Maybe you could > simply ship spicy in virt-viewer flatpak, so it could be run from > command line (please no .desktop)
Is the fact that we are installing a .desktop for spicy the only issue here or you don't want to see a flatpak of spicy in the gitlab-ci anyway? (btw, I'm not planning to upload this to any flatpak provider).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
