On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:18:37AM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > Now, any objection to > > 1. Recommending that we use git URLs in patches?
We can emphasize this, but this has been done in the past, and anyone is free to do it anyway if they want ;) For what it's worth, for small series (just a few patches), it might be a bit overkill. > 2. Having a shared location for branches under review? I've seen various options being discussed (push requests, patchew, shared location, ...), but no clear consensus yet. Shared location was the option with the fewer "free bonuses" (CI, ...), and has the drawback that everyone needs to have access to that location (which is not going to be true for new contributors). Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
