> On 26 Jul 2017, at 09:58, Frediano Ziglio <fzig...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 25 Jul 2017, at 20:01, Frediano Ziglio <fzig...@redhat.com > <mailto:fzig...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 01:39:35PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > +size_t PngCoder::convert_to_dib(uint8_t *out_buf, const uint8_t *data, > size_t size) > +{ > [...] > + const unsigned int width = png_get_image_width(png, info); > + const unsigned int height = png_get_image_height(png, info); > + const size_t stride = compute_dib_stride(width, out_bits); > + const size_t image_size = stride * height; > + const int palette_colors = [=]() { > > If you want to use a function, then give it a name, if you don't want to > use a function, then this can just go in convert_to_dib() body rather > than through a lambda (I know the latter means removing the 'const’). > > Removing the ‘const’? Why? > > > Lambdas are functions. > > I believe Christophe is objecting to using a lambda whereas all other > computations use named functions. But frankly, here, I would have > written: > > const int palette_colors = > out_bits > 8 ? 0 > : bits == 2 ? 4 > : 1 << out_bits; > This was exactly the previous version, just my version has some additional > comments > to make more readable.
So what made you change it? Do you feel that the lambda is more readable somehow? > Not that I don’t like lambdas, but here, it’s a lot of additional syntactic > noise. > > Out of curiosity, I submitted both variants of the code to g++, and got > exactly the same generated code. > > I personally think the purpose of that code was clear even without > a name. > Using a "standard" function requires to declare parameters and pass > them manually, something that lambda capture can do automatically. > > > Christophe > > > By the way, got new version with more old style code. > > Frediano > > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel