On 07/17/2017 11:22 AM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
Although unlikely, theoretically, multiplying two 32-bit
numbers may overflow.
Found by coverity.
Signed-off-by: Uri Lublin <u...@redhat.com>
---
server/red-parse-qxl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/server/red-parse-qxl.c b/server/red-parse-qxl.c
index 33f36923a..0ffa5f7d4 100644
--- a/server/red-parse-qxl.c
+++ b/server/red-parse-qxl.c
@@ -1397,7 +1397,7 @@ bool red_get_surface_cmd(RedMemSlotInfo *slots, int
group_id,
return false;
}
- size = red->u.surface_create.height *
abs(red->u.surface_create.stride);
+ size = red->u.surface_create.height *
(uint64_t)abs(red->u.surface_create.stride);
red->u.surface_create.data =
(uint8_t*)memslot_get_virt(slots, qxl->u.surface_create.data,
size, group_id, &error);
if (error) {
This overflow is already handled by red_validate_surface call.
Indeed.
I'll drop this patch.
Also note that silently the uint64_t size is converted to 32 bit calling
memslot_get_virt so maybe would be better to change size to uint32_t.
Frediano
Thanks,
Uri.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
