On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:12 +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > Hi Vadim, > > > Looking at the code for QxlDod.cpp, I see allocations that look like > this: > > 5c52e50b (Vadim Rozenfeld 2014-09-02 17:36:27 +1000 > 3169) m_ModeNumbers = reinterpret_cast<PUSHORT> (new > (PagedPool) BYTE [sizeof (USHORT) * ModeCount]); > > and corresponding deallocations that look like this: > > 165b53d4 (Vadim Rozenfeld 2015-03-30 22:57:12 +1100 > 3154) delete [] reinterpret_cast<BYTE*>(m_ModeInfo); > 165b53d4 (Vadim Rozenfeld 2015-03-30 22:57:12 +1100 > 3155) delete [] reinterpret_cast<BYTE*>(m_ModeNumbers); > > I was wondering if there was a rationale behind this way of > allocating things vs the more standard: > > m_ModeNumbers = new(PagedPool) USHORT[ModeCount]; > > and > > delete[] m_ModeNumbers; > > ?
just silly leftovers after my playing with WinDbg, trying to trace some memory allocation problem at that time. Cheers, Vadim. > > Thanks > Christophe _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
