On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:04:30AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:36:18AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > What about: > > > > > > "style: Change boolean style convention > > > > > > Was agreed to use C99 syntax for boolean. > > > New code should attempt to follow the new style." > > > > "Following > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2017-February/035800.html > > , the consensus was to use 'bool' rather than 'gboolean', and to use > > true/false rather than TRUE/FALSE. New code should attempt to follow the > > new style." > > > > Christophe > > > > "and to use true/false rather than TRUE/FALSE." is maybe misleading. > Few places where it's another type should stay consistent with the type > (unless I didn't understand).
Imo it's fine not to be 100% accurate in the commit log, the actual change has all the details. Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
