On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 07:16:04AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > From: Victor Toso <m...@victortoso.com> > > > > As there is a need to iterate over every encoder:codec pair and we do > > a check for every encoder and every codec, g_strsplit() is less > > complex and easier to follow. > > > > This change makes much easier to extend the input which is currently a > > list of tuples encoder:video-codec. > > > > Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victort...@redhat.com> > > I had a though this morning about the syntax. > > We are moving from a set or "encoder:codec" separated with ";" to > a set of "encoder:codec:priority". All this to allow same priority in > the list. Why not having a "light" separator, something like > > "gstreamer:vp8 gstreamer:h264;gstreamer:h264;spice:mjpeg" > > (not the space). So the first 2 will have same "priority" while > the others less (but different) ?
Do we need to have an extra-smart string-based syntax like this? Or can we side-step this problem by having a higher-level API? Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
