On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Victor Toso <victort...@redhat.com> wrote:
> If we are in coroutine context, fallback to return in idle; Otherwise,
> let GTask decide if callback should be called or not.
> ---
> src/gtask-helper.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/gtask-helper.h b/src/gtask-helper.h
> index 81c041f..8771021 100644
> --- a/src/gtask-helper.h
> +++ b/src/gtask-helper.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,51 @@ void g_task_helper_return_error_in_idle(GTask *task,
> GError *error);
> void g_task_helper_return_new_error_in_idle(GTask *task, GQuark domain, gint
> code, const char *format, ...);
> void g_task_helper_return_pointer_in_idle(GTask *task, gpointer result,
> GDestroyNotify result_destroy);
>
> +#define g_task_helper_return_boolean(...) \
> + do { \
> + if (coroutine_self_is_main()) { \
> + g_task_return_boolean(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } else { \
> + g_task_helper_return_boolean_in_idle(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define g_task_helper_return_int(...) \
> + do { \
> + if (coroutine_self_is_main()) { \
> + g_task_return_int(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } else { \
> + g_task_helper_return_int_in_idle(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define g_task_helper_return_error(...) \
> + do { \
> + if (coroutine_self_is_main()) { \
> + g_task_return_error(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } else { \
> + g_task_helper_return_error_in_idle(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define g_task_helper_return_new_error(...) \
> + do { \
> + if (coroutine_self_is_main()) { \
> + g_task_return_new_error(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } else { \
> + g_task_helper_return_new_error_in_idle(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define g_task_helper_return_pointer(...) \
> + do { \
> + if (coroutine_self_is_main()) { \
> + g_task_return_pointer(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } else { \
> + g_task_helper_return_pointer_in_idle(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> G_END_DECLS
>
> #endif /* __G_TASK_HELPER_H__ */
> --
> 2.5.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
NACK!
This is not what we agreed on IRC yesterday :-\
Anyways, with
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2016-May/029040.html
this patch doesn't seem to be needed anymore.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
