On 27 May 2015 at 20:04, Frediano Ziglio <fzig...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Only EBUSY error was handled. This could cause code to believe
> reserve was successful while it failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fzig...@redhat.com>

This has been there since I wrote qxl, so I expect I had some reason
for it, but I can't remember it
now..

Most likely is something had the bo reserved already and we reentered
from somewhere we shouldn't
but I think a lot of the horrible code went away.

so because I can't justify the hack,
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
Dave.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to