> > Did the spice-html5 people already found a way to generate scancodes? > > I don't see the relation. For example, in case of html5 client to spiceterm, > you > don't need (and don't have) hw scancode.
I talk about html client with qemu. The suggested protocol extension provides a clean solution for the html5 client. > Why do you want to mix scancodes and keysym in the same message? First, because it solves the html client problem. Second, because it results in simpler code. > If the server needs keysyms, it can have the keysym capability. If it wants > scancode, it should not advertize it. > > > If you really need both, we could have the protocol (another capability) > specifying that a keysym event is immediately followed by the corresponding > scancode sequence. For what reason do you want such a complex solution? But wait, I will post a patch with many cleanups tomorrow. You can then see how it fits all together. Many thanks for your patience, Dietmar _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
