Hi Christophe, If adding a ca-file property to OvirtProxy is not acceptable, would you consider adding (something like) the following function to ovirt-proxy.c?
Please note that this is a preliminary variant that I haven't tested much, and may not have enough error checking! void ovirt_proxy_load_ca_cert_file (OvirtProxy *proxy, const gchar *ca_file_name, GError **error) { GMappedFile *ca_file = NULL; GBytes *bytes = NULL; gconstpointer ca_data; gsize cert_length = 0; ca_file = g_mapped_file_new(ca_file_name, FALSE, error); if (ca_file == NULL) { goto error; } bytes = g_mapped_file_get_bytes(ca_file); cert_length = g_bytes_get_size(bytes); ca_data = g_bytes_get_data (bytes, &cert_length); set_downloaded_ca_cert(proxy, (char*)ca_data, cert_length); error: if (ca_file != NULL) g_object_unref(ca_file); if (bytes != NULL) g_object_unref(bytes); } Cheers, iordan On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:53 PM, i iordanov <iiorda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > I hope this is not too much to ask, but would it be possible for > OvirtProxy to have a ca-cert-file property as well as a ca-cert property? > This way, supporting the spice-ca-file option as well as the existing > aSPICE functionality will be much easier. > > Thanks! > iordan > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:09 PM, i iordanov <iiorda...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Christophe, >> >> I read through some govirt code, and I think you're right that gvfs is >> only used during the fetching of the certificate. If that's the case, I >> will start by not fetching the CA automatically, but requiring for users to >> provide it to aSPICE the same way as they have to provide it for a simple >> SPICE connection (within the "Import CA" dialog in aSPICE, which is >> analogous to the --spice-ca-file option in virt-viewer). I think this will >> work for most if not all people. >> >> Thanks again! >> iordan >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Christophe Fergeau >> <cferg...@redhat.com>wrote: >> >>> Hey Iordan, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:11:45PM -0400, i iordanov wrote: >>> > Hi Christophe, >>> > >>> > It is currently very hard, bordering on impossible to build gvfs for >>> > Android, because it ends up depending on GTK. The sequence of >>> > dependencies is: >>> > >>> > glib network I/O -> gvfs -> libsoup-gnome -> gnome-keyring -> gcr-3 -> >>> > gcr-ui-3 -> GTK >>> > >>> > The glib guys are arguing that this is not a bug, since it's just a >>> > dependency that's missing, but I am trying to convince them that the >>> > low-level glib should not end up depending on a UI library... >>> > >>> > Hence for the moment, I absolutely cannot use glib network I/O. Can >>> > you tell me, since you've written libgovirt, do you think it's >>> > possible to add functionality to *it* rather than writing workarounds >>> > for client software? I could work around this issue in aSPICE, but >>> > that would not help for any other client on any other platform that >>> > doesn't have GTK. >>> > >>> > Regardless of whether you do agree it's best if govirt either stopped >>> > relying on glib network file I/O or had an option to use a different >>> > method, what library would you say would be best suited to replace all >>> > the network file I/O operations that you have in govirt with a >>> > download -> local file I/O sequence? Libcurl comes to mind, but >>> > perhaps libsoup is better suited for the purpose in your opinion? >>> >>> Could you try what I suggested in >>> >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2013-September/014430.html >>> ? I think gvfs is only used if you use the helpers to fetch the >>> certificate, and the rest of the code is just doing calls into >>> librest/libsoup which I think are not using gio/gvfs. >>> If this is a correct, then I think it's not a big issue that you don't >>> have >>> gvfs on your platform. If it is, I'll have to look where/how it's used to >>> figure out how to workaround this. >>> >>> Hope that helps, >>> >>> Christophe >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> The conscious mind has only one thread of execution. >> > > > > -- > The conscious mind has only one thread of execution. > -- The conscious mind has only one thread of execution.
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel