Hi
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:52 PM, i iordanov <iiorda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello SPICE developers! > > When I was coding aSPICE I elected to use non-UI code from spicy. This may > have not been the wisest choice, because the recommended client is now > remote/virt-viewer. I'm guessing because spicy has not been maintained for > some time, it lacks logic to authenticate with a username to an oVirt proxy.I > have a few questions regarding this work. > > You can consider spicy has a test client for spice-gtk. Maybe we should move it to a tests/ subdirectory to make it more clear. 1) Have I understood correctly that oVirt proxy support is what is lacking > in spicy? > ovirt is not what I would call a "proxy". You can ask ovirt for credentials to a vm it manages, and then connect to it. (same with libvirt) > > 2) Are there any other connection types that require a username? > sure, that really depend what server/proxy/service you are talking about. > 3) Do you think it is feasible to isolate the code which deals with oVirt > proxy handling in virt-viewer and use that in aSPICE? > The isolation from libgovirt should be enough for implementing a different client easily. > 4) Am I better off porting the non-UI code from virt-viewer to Android and > using that instead of the non-UI code from spicy? > No, the virt-viewer code is very much gtk+ specific. All we can share for android should stop at non-toolkit level. (spice-glib, govirt, etc) > Thanks in advance for any input on this topic! > yw! -- Marc-André Lureau
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
