----- Mensaje original ----- > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Since you can already provide the password via either URI argument or by > > API, there is no need for an additional way in spice-gtk. > > I disagree with this statement (even if this will not be solved by this > series). Something that is automatically used by spice-gtk when provided, > but which is not as insecure as putting the password in the URI would be > nice to have in spice-gtk.
The URI or API "password" property are not more insecure than a separate file. Remember that spice-gtk isn't a client, and spicy is only for testing. _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
