El jue, 28-06-2012 a las 14:27 +0300, Uri Lublin escribió: > > Are you sure you need namedpipe object for that? > > > > I think you could have used regular GWin32InputStream GWin32OutputStream.. > > > > (that was my initial design, iirc) > > I'm not sure I really need a namedpipe object. > It's one way to implement it, using NamedPipe and NamedPipe connection > and GIOStream. > Does GWin32InputStream/OutputStream better ? In what way ?
GWin32InputStream/OutputStream are used by the NamedPipeConnection. The difference is GWin32IOStream is more generic, as it can take any handle. This allows you to create it any way you want (though it should be at least OVERLAPPED to be really async, iirc) > Note that the NamedPipe class was only acting as server. > These first two patches implements a NamedPipe client. Yeah, I think it was made like this by design. In fact, I think it should be a private object to NamedPipeListener. I would avoid reusing NamedPipe for clients. It shouldn't be difficult to change, sorry for not noticing that before. _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
