On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58:05AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> > > Is that causing issues with newer GCCs? Iirc the rest of the structure is > supposed to be initialized to 0 when it's only partially initialized.
This is a result of -Wmissing-field-initializers - see the other patch for a example of why we want to use that warning flag, and thus need to make all initializers explicit Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
