> To be most broadly useful, a HTML5 tunnelled version of SPICE would really > want to be architected as a proxy, rather than directly in the QEMU SPICE > server.
Isn't this sort of proxy a well solved problem? That is, can't we safely presume that we can use an existing proxy or slightly modify an existing one, once we complete the 'easy' task of a javascript spice client? Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
