On 03/13/2012 01:55 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > ----- Mensaje original ----- >> Hi, >> >> as Marc-Andre has decided to drop log4cpp, I would like to at least >> revert the part of the message format. The reason is simple, Spice-QA >> guys are developing a test framework, which uses the log4cpp format >> we had. >> >> Opinions? > > IOW, why not just implementing a glog handler with the "expected format"? > > Tbh, I am not convinced that parsing logging output is a good way to test a > functionality, as it tends to break very easily... >
Why not? Simply, in custom handler I can not get __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ to the caller. It's substituted by the handler function name. -- Peter Hatina EMEA ENG-Desktop Development Red Hat Czech, Brno _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
