On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:47:07PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > For both LAN (high bandwidth, high performance) and WAN (high > latency) perhaps it may be worthwhile to increase (via socket > options) the TCP receive (on the client) and send (on the server) > buffers for the display channel? It will cause: > - bigger TCP window (which is good for both cases above) > - some waste of memory (negligible, I think it's enough to increase > to 256K or so for each). > > I suspect it might make a difference especially in video streaming. > > It's a simple patch (I hope - via setsockopt() ) and does not > require feature negotiation, but I'm not sure I have the tools to > test such change.
You expect the change to produce a higher bandwidth? you could test it with a combination of a wan emulator and swapnas work, or with one of the artificial tests (server/tests/test_display_no_ssl). But not very simple, I agree. > > Thoughts? > Y. > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
