On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote: >> Suggested changes: >> spice - merge spice-protocol into it >> spice-protocol - kill it >> common - extract to a separate library, it's own configure, pkg-config, >> name it spice-render, >> and have spice-gtk and spice (server and old client) rely on it. > > I assume this "libspice" will contain spice/common + spice-protocol? Or do > you envision the protocol bits to go elsewhere?
I could still be packaged in spice-protocol-devel, spice-controller-devel, spice-vdagent-devel etc.. > I like this idea more than merging keeping the current moduleset and > merging spice-gtk in spice, but I was under the impression that turning > common/ into a library was difficult, which is why we chose to merge > spice-gtk in spice instead. If it's not that hard, I'mm all for it! Hard, hopefully not so much. It should be a *lot* of perl -p -i -e 's/foo/spice_foo/g' basically.. -- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
