----- Original Message ----- > From: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com> > To: "Marian Krcmarik" <mkrcm...@redhat.com> > Cc: spice-de...@freedesktop.org > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:03:38 PM > Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] nographic option > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 15:06 -0400, Marian Krcmarik wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "John A. Sullivan III" <jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com> > > > To: spice-de...@freedesktop.org > > > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:14:19 PM > > > Subject: [Spice-devel] nographic option > > > Hello, all. I was a little surprised to see in > > > http://spice-space.org/page/Running > > Most likely it's not the best example cli. > > > > >that qemu is invoked with the > > > -nographic option. Later documents do not have that in their > > > examples. > > > Is there any advantage to invoking it? Thanks - John > > > > Take a look at man qemu:) I believe it's described well: > > > > Normally, QEMU uses SDL to display the VGA output. With this option, > > you can totally disable graphical output so that QEMU is a simple > > command line application. The emulated serial port is redirected on > > the console. Therefore, you can still use QEMU to debug a Linux > > kernel with a serial console. > <snip> > <grin> This time I did read it :) That's why I was surprised to see > the > recommendation to include it in the SPICE documentation I referenced. > Doesn't spice normally replace sdl? If I am using spice as my graphics > display, why would I include -nographic? Thanks - John
Yes, you are right, this option was deleted from the example command line, Thanks:) _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
