Luca Filipozzi wrote: > @all: Having slept on things, I'm changing my position from (2a) to (2c) > since it is more appropriate to correct the lack of charging Debian 5% > on sponsorships than it is to correct the actual/perceived > miscommunication between Debian and SPI. > > So, for clarity: > - do not refund Debian for 2016-2019; do not charge fees on Debian > sponsorships prior to 2016; do not refund other projects (2c) > - charge all projects' donations and sponsorships the same 5% fee, which > is the current practice (3b) > > @president: kindly consider revising the draft resolution per above > since there are now several of us in holding this view.
The latest draft of the resolution for tomorrow's meeting is attached. -- ---------------------------- Michael Schultheiss E-mail: schul...@spi-inc.org
Resolution 2020-06-22.mcs.1: Conferences and SPI 5% fee WHEREAS 1. Software in the Public Interest, Inc. (SPI) is a Debian Trusted Organization. 2. The annual Debian Conference (Debian) utilizes SPI to collect some of the conference sponsorship funds. 3. SPI has inconsistently charged its 5% administrative fee for conference sponsorships. 4. SPI has not yet determined the effect of waiving the 5% administrative fee for conference sponsorships in perpetuity. THE SPI BOARD RESOLVES THAT 1. Going forward, SPI will consistently charge all projects donations and conference sponsorships a 5% administrative fee, as is SPI's current practice. 2. SPI will not retroactively charge Debian its 5% adminsitrative fee for Debian conferences held prior to 2016. 3. SPI will not refund associated projects the 5% adminsitrative fee for conferences held 2016-2019.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
