Thanks Lucas,
On 03/10/2019 22:40, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 07:36:10PM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
I believe SPI should defer to Debian to explain such complicated stuff
I'm fairly confident that it was Debian folks that provided that content
in the first place. I'm happy to ask the liaison for updated text.
Sorry, what I meant was that SPI's website should let Debian's website
get into implementation details. As soon as a description has made it
clear where a project stands relative to other associated projects, I
think it has enough information. The only value I could see in putting
more information on SPI's website would be to publish a view without the
project's bias, but I don't think Debian is trying to hide its usage of
Linux.
P.S. I didn't mean to say the issue was just SPI's fault - it could very
well be that such a text came from Debian, but removal remains one way
to solve the issue (although I agree that all other things being equal,
the more the associated project agrees with our description, the better).
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
