On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 03:34:12PM +0200, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > > So, I guess there's a trade-off here. We can have really simple bylaws > and give the board the ability to modify them, trusting that our nearly > complete transparency of operations and the legal context in which we > operate provide the ability to observe and react should the board ever > "go nuts". I'm quite comfortable with this approach, but I recognize > that not everyone may be.
I suppose a lot of people would consider a board changing the bylaws without approval from the members to be going nuts. Cheers, Bill. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
