Correct. We would actually have a subdomain (that we'd like to keep using).
Perhaps it's not unreasonable to expect that all associated projects would, or
would be able to create one?
-hilmar
On Nov 22, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/21/2013 08:18 PM, Robert Brockway wrote:
>>
>>> As an individual director I cannot speak for SPI, so this is just a
>>> personal opinion. Only the board or certain officers can do that.
>>
>> I am not opposed to this but I think spi should have a specific domain for
>> this like spiprojects.org or something like that.
>>
>> JD
>
> Or use existing (sub)domains owned by the individual projects?
> e.g. lists.open-bio.org in this case runs the mailing lists for the
> OBF, http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo
>
> Peter
> (OBF board member)
--
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
===========================================================
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
