On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:37:41PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes ("Re: Code of Conduct at events"):> > What happened was the opposite: two developpers manhandled a third > > one. The third one get expelled from Debconf. The two did not get > > real sanction beyond being sermoned. But of course the public memory > > of the event is different. > That's unfortunate, if true. I wasn't there so I can't comment. There's a fairly detailed writeup in the debian-private archives if you wish to look; FWIW the incident referred to above was one of a series of incidents that occurred over an extended period. > > > This is the problem with your proposal: your proposal is more about > > defining a set of rules that events organizers have to follow than > > rules that participants have to follow. > > It's not about "rules that organisers have to follow". When an event > organiser writes "this is our policy about XYZ" in the README, that > means that they are /choosing/ to set out these rules and /promising/ > to follow them. > > > But how the organizers will be held accountable ? What information > > will be used to make the decisions ? > > In the usual ways that project organisers are held accountable. > (Or, are not, in some contexts.) > > Ian. > _______________________________________________ > Spi-general mailing list > Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org > http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general > -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
