Jimmy, > Decisions are made according to their internal rules in the charter linked > from > the resolution preamble, and Andy or Gregers lets us know about them. They > don't seem to be able to make independent decisions. However, I agree that > their charter could use various clarifications and revisions. I've been > meaning > to suggest specific details to them, but none of the problems are serious > enough to further delay approving them.
Well, for prior organizations we haven't allowed having more than one liaison for *any* organization to avoid confusion. Why would OpenWRT be different? One of the two needs to be the main liaison, and the other an alternate. For replacement of the liaisons, their procedure isn't any more muddy than anyone else's. We can live with it. > If we have doubts about what to do in a specific case, we can just delay any > action while we investigate, just like we'd do if Debian's Secretary told us > that a GR overruled a DPL decision but the DPL told us otherwise. We don't want to repeat past mistakes with new affiliates. --Josh _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
