Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Member communications II"):
> What is the problem we are trying to solve?
> The board's continual failures in communication and following protocol.Right. > How does this motion address the problem any more than the other motions > that have already been passed? It makes it clear that the Board is supposed to defer late business rather than proceed with it - a matter which seems to have been doubted. It also sets out what the basis might be for proceeding anyway, the mechanism for making such a decision, and holds specific officers responsible for enforcement. But to be honest, I would be satisfied with a clear statement from the Secretary and President that they will, henceforth, defer late business. If such a statement is not forthcoming then I would like the Board to explicitly vote on my proposal, or something like it. At least then next time it comes to elections we will know who to depose. Ian. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
