Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Meeting log for 2008-12-17"):
> On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:13 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For other kinds of resolutions there are of course other isomorphic
> > problems. That is why THE MEMBERSHIP MUST BE GIVEN THE CHANCE TO
> > COMMENT!
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to make this argument on -private, where the
> contributing members are?
No, because discussions should be in public if there is no reason for
them to be private. We had already agreed that, surely ? I can't
seem to find a resolution about it right now.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
