On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:42:15 -0700 Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Not for the rest of PostgreSQL I assure you. Command Prompt is just > > one player in a field of dozens. Command Prompt also does not > > dictate in any way how the PostgreSQL community operates. We serve > > at the grace of the community. I have to admit that this is one of > > your more nonsensical posts. > I'm sorry that I was not making sense. The statement you made to MJ > was not one I am used to seeing from an SPI board member. Fair enough. > > It's pretty clear that there are now two camps that are not > particularly interested in each other's project, which hasn't really > been the case with SPI until recently. This really isn't true at all. You should consider that at least 4 of the board members are not "Debian" people, although they are involved with Debian. (I was firmly reminded of this on a chat with Jimmy). What is clear is that SPI is actually trying to get its act together (and doing a pretty good job) and that means certainly are coming into play that didn't when you were around. Things like priorities, channels of communication and financial accountability. > > SPI has had various people who had a financial interest in Debian on > the board. I owned about 8% of Progeny, and various Progeny employees > were on the board, but we weren't "The Debian Company". And? > > And I am not entirely comfortable with this. Sorry. It's sincerely > how I feel. > Not comfortable with which? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
