Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When did spi-general become "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? > > Might I suggest that idle legal speculation, having little or nothing to do > with SPI business, be taken to another mailing list, please?
Right. And might I suggest that SPI get off its collective backside and ask its legal advisers whether tracking down every contributor and relicensing or replacing every contribution to the debian web site is 1/ sufficient and 2/ necessary, instead of legal-wanker-discussing? That advice has a lot to do with SPI business and even projects that do centralise most copyrights sometimes forget things like their website, so I expect it would apply to other SPI projects too. Sun and the Mozilla corporations (and probably FSF and SFLC) have significant interests in promoting copyright extraction, which SPI doesn't have. As I've written on other topics, I'd much rather the debian project took SPI's advice rather than Sun's. Going back to something mentioned the original topic: what contracts did SPI sign for the PostgreSQL Conference and have they not appeared on public record just because they're too recent, or did I miss them, or what? Regards, -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
