On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:43:36PM -0400, David Graham wrote: > That's a point on the surface, but I don't necessarily see it that way: I > am not suggesting that SPI not actively help its projects cooperate or > even advocate, only that we do so by the request of our member projects, > and not on our own whim.
So I guess the way I view this is more that when a member project wants to "request" stuff like this, the way that should work is by having some of the people in that project get more actively involved in SPI and make it happen -- which is pretty much what Joshua's doing. As long as that doesn't end up as trying to force other projects to be involved in projects when they don't want to -- which is possible, but I think easily avoidable if we keep it in mind -- then it's all good. Obviously, YMMV, but free software and grass roots activities and promotion in the US really seems like something that could do a lot of good to me. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
