MJ Ray wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/votes/vote6/jdrake.txt
I am inviting anyone who has any questions to ask them.


I also copied spi-private on this because I know there are people on private that are not on -general.

On the platform:
1. Should "associative projects" be associated projects?

Maybe, grammar has never been my strongest talent. That's why editors exist.

2. Can you give an example of an illegitimate talk opportunity?

That is a tough one. I wrote illegitimate because I wanted people to know that each talk would be considered and that it is not an open bank. It may not be the talk that is illegitimate but perhaps the venue.

If we have two people that want sponsorship. One is talking to Ohio Linux Fest, the other is keynote at FOSSDEM. I would think that assuming the ability to only sponsor one talk, we would sponsor the FOSSDEM talk.

The reasoning is that the FOSSDEM talk is likely to provoke a wider audience and possibly greater opportunities for FOSS software.


3. Does Command Prompt, Inc have a conflict of interest with SPI?
(I ask mainly because I didn't see much on its web site about its
mission or structure.)

I wouldn't believe so. Command Prompt is a for profit entity. Our mission is simple, provide services and support to people and companies using PostgreSQL.


General questions, other candidates may answer too:
4. Would you vote for or against giving away SPI assets?

It would depend on the situation. I assume you are referring to opensource.org. I lean toward not giving opensource.org away but it was really hard to get a solid trail of information about what exactly were the issues with that domain. I even read through Debian archives to try and figure it out.

An asset that is truly SPI property (unlike say a server that is PostgreSQL's but title to SPI because of the legality), should stay with SPI unless SPI is getting something out of it, money, or a swap in assets.

5. Will you abstain from votes about things not mentioned in your
platform?

No, I think that would be silly. Just because it isn't in my platform doesn't mean I don't have an opinion. I would however abstain from votes that I did not feel I had enough information to make what I deemed a good decision.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



Thanks,


--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general

Reply via email to