Hi, Thank you for comment.
> What's the rationale for taking a class rather than an instance? Since 2.1, we added `:force:` option to some directives for code-blocks. As a result, we need to control the option of lexers for each code-block. It is hard to control for already instantiated lexers. So they don't use the option. This is why I need the not instantiated lexers. Note: I though the support will be dropped since 4.0, not 3.0. (Is my English in changes correct?) >It seems that one might have a lexer class with options and one might want to >instantiate it with specific options before handing it to Sphinx. Could you let me know what option do you pass to lexers? I will reconsider how to incorporate it to sphinx-core. Thanks, Takeshi KOMIYA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sphinx-users/CAFmkQAP0czmSD2UNM6P50--jSHtYbujgh%2BK%2BcPfN%2BDQd4ZmpKg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
