On 03/26/2013 08:22 AM, turgut kalfaoğlu wrote: > hi there. Many of the users who use our servers for SMTP use an > alternate port. So far I didn't have spamdyke running on that port (it > was only running port 25), but I just started it. I disabled many of > its checks, such as missing RDNS, as many of them do not have a reverse > DNS entry (telecoms do not bother with such things). > > I was wondering if it is recommended, and which options are best to use > on local users.. > PS: I use spamdyke, spamassassin,qmail-scanner-queue. > > Many thanks, -t >
Authenticated users pass all tests, so as long as your local users authenticate (and they should if they don't), you don't need to ease up any spamdyke rules for local users. -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
