Thanks eric, i have read the tcprules man, then my notation is correct
according to the man.

Best regards.

Pablo

2013/1/31 Eric Shubert <[email protected]>:
>
>
> tcp.smtp is not so flexible. "man tcprules" says this:
>
> Address ranges:
>
>         tcprules treats  1.2.3.37-53:ins  as  an  abbreviation  for  the
>   rules
>         1.2.3.37:ins,  1.2.3.38:ins,  and so on up through 1.2.3.53:ins.
>   Simi-
>         larly, 10.2-3.:ins is an abbreviation for 10.2.:ins and 10.3.:ins.
>
> On 01/31/2013 09:28 AM, Linux wrote:
>> Sorry my friends for the trouble and being offtopic to spamdyke
>> handled properly so you as the notation of a network segment tcp.smtp?
>>
>> example: 192.168.0.1/19
>>
>> is
>>
>> HostMin: 192.168.0.1
>> HostMax: 192.168.31.254
>>
>>
>> correct notation is
>>
>> 192.168.0-192.168.31.: Allow
>>
>>
>> Is that correct?
>>
>> Thanks and sorry for not being completely on the topic.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>> 2013/1/31 Linux <[email protected]>:
>>> Eric thank you very much :) , very clarifying your information.
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>> Pablo
>>>
>>> 2013/1/31 Eric Shubert <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/31/2013 08:51 AM, Linux wrote:
>>>>> Hello friends, I want to include a segment on my whitelist ip but do
>>>>> not know which format to use,
>>>>>
>>>>> this is valid?
>>>>>
>>>>> 192.168.1.0/20
>>>>>
>>>>> or is another format?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your help
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The format is quite flexible:
>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README_ip_file_format.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>> spamdyke-users-/[email protected]
>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to