On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Arne-Hilm Birkner < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,**** > > We had a similar problem with one our customer…**** > > ** ** > > We are using two antispam-proxies (small virtuell machines – with spamdyke > -rented)**** > > They are working well…**** > > ** ** > > Sometimes it is not the configuration it is the structure ;-) > That was actually my second idea and a long-term solution they were good with. I already use linode.com for another virtual server and they have oodles of bandwidth and don't charge for inbound connections. I planned on routing all their mail through one of those first and only allowing the good stuff to proceed to their server. Their server could then only allow connections from the virtual server which should save their bandwidth to the ISP. -- J.R. Lillard System / Network Admin Web Programmer Hyphen Communications
_______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
